Monthly Archive for February, 2007

Taxes, the Taxman and the Masses

Well it is almost time to file your income tax. Sitting on the buses these past couple of weeks, I keep noticing the Ufile ads plastered all over our public transit system. So that’s where our tax dollars go eh? To provide a century old forum for advertising to brainwash us … subtly. But that’s beside the point of this post, I am here to tell you today that we shouldn’t be paying high income taxes.

Your response: Duh… we all know that one.

My response: Everyone generally agrees on that point, except for the oddball who would claim that they are willing to sacrifice a rather substantial chunk of their annual income for the rest of Canada. I am not saying that I wouldn’t, nor am I stating that everyone else is selfish. I am saying that as much as we all believe in the Canadian way of equalization payments and a social safety net with health care for all and so on, I think taxing income is not the way to go.

Your response: Okay, so what’s your point?

My response: Growing up, I had to endure my dad’s ever-constant lectures about economics and business. Getting into university, I endured a never-ending wave of teachings revolving around our Canadian “philosophy” or “ideology”. Up to this day, we continue to hate the GST even though it literally saved our country from an eternal deficit, yet we merely wave a fist at Revenue Canada (oh sorry…the politicians now call it the Canada Revenue Agency) who takes away a chunk of our income. This year, I estimate they’ll take away at least $—-, give or take a couple digits. Now think of what you could do (or for that matter, what I could do) with that money.

Your response: Yeah well, so what?

My response: So what? The money that we would have in our so-called pockets could either be re-invested, put aside to savings or put to good use in the economy. That would in turn create a very good effect. Now let’s re-examine this situation but since income taxes would be lowered to a much lesser percentage, this ultimately means a great amount of income for people to make use of (and survive off of…). To fund all of those public programs that we hold dear to our Canadian way, we would apply a flat tax percentage across all products (goods and services), with the exception of any food item purchased from a grocery store. By doing so, those who consume more, will essentially pay more taxes.

Your response: You’re crazy, where’s the logic or reasoning in that?

My response: There is plenty of logic and reason behind a consumption tax. Income taxes that simply use an income bracket to take off chunks of income, hoping to cash in on the wealthy, is actually flawed. There is really only so much money you can take off of someone’s income. Why is a consumption tax practical? Here’re three reasons why:

  1. People regardless of who they are will pay the same tax percentage. What differs is based on the value of the product they purchase, rather than using an income bracket to determine the tax percentage. This is where it is actually fair for everyone regardless of how much money one makes. Ironically, this has the possibility of creating a win-win-win situation for people concerned about the social network, tax payers in general, and the government.
  2. By having people, organizations and businesses pay the proper proportion of taxes for every item that they purchase, there is an actual residual effect within the economic and social policy for the government or for that matter, the world. Think about it. For every product that we purchase, we are consuming something from this planet. For every computer, car, desk, chair, air conditioner, bottle of wine that we spend our money on; there are residual effects. The car is the simplest example because it DOES pollute, it is involved in numerous hit and runs, it requires paved roads and it involves the financial industry (insurance companies), etc. The tax revenue collected from this would be greater than the income tax formula that Canada continues to use currently.
  3. When does the government collect income tax? Once a year. When is sales tax collected? Every time you or I purchase something or pay for a service. Not to mention, you get to choose where your taxes are coming from.

So as the fiscal year comes to end and the taxman is coming to your doorstep to grab a portion of your annual fortune, perhaps it is time to pay attention to our country’s gold mine: you, me and the other persons that we know. I am not declaring that sales tax is the ultimate solution to our problems, but it is time that we lose the perception that sales tax is bad, because regardless of whether you’re a thrifty individual or a shopaholic, it works for both kinds of people (as well as people in between the two extremes). With the former you have more money to save and invest, and with the latter you have more money which equals more buying power.

Your response:  Aren’t you overlooking a lot of vital and important factors such as inflation and other cycles in the economy?

My response:  I’m not overlooking them.  I do agree that my overview isn’t absolute, but I am simply pointing out that moving from an income-tax-dependent revenue over to a more (not totally dropping income tax here) sales tax oriented funding system would be beneficial to everyone.

Pennies and Change

technorati tags:, , , income, , , , , , ,

Why NOT to get a job (aka. Do It Yourself)

I keep accumulating post ideas, while running out of time to actual write a post. However this I felt was a timely post for many of my friends, family and in general, people I care for.

We all go through life wondering what our purpose is, we all ask ourselves if we are on the right path. Or at least, most of us question our choices in life that have led us to where we are today. My firm belief is that if we really understand who we are and want to continually improve ourselves as individuals within a vast municipal, provincial, national and international / global society, we (yes that includes myself) must come to the realization that we should not regret or dwell on our past mistakes and choices, but focus on what we can do to learn from it and create a positive impact on ourselves and society/environment as a whole.

But I digress from silly preaching, and merely direct you to two web pages that I stumbled upon today while doing homework. Yep…that productive.

my unemployed life - is really an inspiring blog by Sung Park who made the choice to go unemployed (71 days and counting apparently) and focus on what he really wanted to do in his life. On his blog, he points people to an article that I found fascinating, not generally because it had anything new to add to my overall philosophy about being employed, but rather it merely stated eloquently and effectively why we shouldn’t be employed. It was an affirmation.

That article is by Steve Pavlina and is titled 10 Reasons You Should Never Get a Job and I would encourage everyone to read it. My only objection to the overall title and I think there were other comments on his article as well about it, is the fact that this philosophy is not for everyone. Not everyone is entrepreneurial, or carries the spirit and even when they do, it takes time, it takes hard work, and it definitely requires an individual to understand their strengths and weaknesses to do their own thing and therefore, find their own path. So I wouldn’t say you should never get a job. But I would say, those are 10 reasons why everyone should work for themselves. Both figuratively and literally, but either path works.

technorati tags:, , , work, , , , , ,

A Happy New Year!

Well, I figured that I would have gone for dim sum today to celebrate the Chinese New Year. But my family decided to go for noodles instead today because of the crazy crowds that would show up at any Chinese restaurant. We did walk through the malls overstocked with New Year merchandise. Red. Red. More red. A serious overload. That’s a typical Chinese New Year though! Red and gold. Can’t get enough of those two lucky colours. Design wise, it works and has continued to work for many many (many x nth #) years. I guess that’s an interesting aspect of applying colour, culture and “superstitious beliefs” into design.

My father came over to Canada in his teens to study at University of Alberta more than 30 years ago, and he often comments on the drastic change of options in the variety of Chinese food available to us today. It is rather amusing knowing that almost everyone I know continues to seek out the mysterious dish of sweet and sour chicken balls with rice. Of course this North Americanized food is not actually Chinese food! Fortunately or unfortunately, it is now forever associated with the Chinese cuisine. So I guess that means it is Chinese food … in North America. So why is it that frankfurters became hotdogs in America, but sweet and sour chicken balls which really is a North American creation has become part of the Chinese cuisine? ha! Very odd tangent thought eh?   On second note:  Wikipedia suggests that Chicken balls is in fact somewhat of a Canadian creation.  Indeed if that is true, not only do we have Rick Mercer suggesting to Americans that we eat beaver balls, Canadians can also put forth the claim towards chicken balls, though we may have to fight the British on that one.

Anyways, the point was that my father only had a mere two or three dishes for dim sum, but now there are an odd 30 or more dishes to select from!  The fact that there are now small little checklists with English translations makes it so much easier for a bona fide jook-sing to order dim sum at all Chinese restaurants.  Go figure…

 Tea and Chopsticks

But aside from the festivities which will continue on for the week, my course in Systems Analysis and Design is driving me up the wall with workload not to mention all the projects up my sleave.  Why do I jump into all this?  Oh well . . . keeping life interesting I guess.

Just for the sake of another random topic change for the New Year, I am really enjoying the fact that artists like the Barenaked Ladies are offering their albums for purchase electronically via download.  Old news, yes.  What’s the big deal you say?  Well the difference is that they don’t have the extra annoying digital rights management (DRM) protection that iTunes and all the other major labels put on their music files!  It means I can make as many copies of the file as I want and I can put it on to a cd with other music without dealing with the obstacles that DRM sets up to merely hinder people who don’t want to deal with additional barriers in technology.  Greatest thing is that all the money goes towards the artist so you know you’re not paying a big corporation to just sit there and collect.

Tomorrow, perhaps I will finally get to my post about taxes and their potentially astonishing effects on us.

 

Power of Touch

Seriously … forget Star Wars, Star Trek and all those other science fiction shows. Those touch screens we are usually so amazed about are just around the corner…

I wanted to post the video but it doesn’t seem to be working so just… Click here

leafs nation: 5-6 (OT) penguins

Yesterday I was very fortunate to go to the Leafs game at the Air Canada Centre. It was my first time watching a game in the ACC, all the games I have watched have been at Maple Leaf Gardens. I hadn’t been to a live hockey game in years, the last one I can recall being the Toronto Maple Leafs versus the New Jersey Devils, sometime in the mid-late eighties. My family although big Leafs fan, would never pay the ridiculous prices for tickets … nevertheless we were extremely lucky that my dad would occasionally get tickets given to him. So yesterday I got to take a step back into the world that I hadn’t been in touch with for quite sometime, something I suspect that most Leafs fans would not even have the opportunity to do considering the cost of each ticket which is rather unfortunate in my opinion. I guess the sad thing about the Leafs Nation is the fact that there are so many people willing to pay whatever the price for tickets to a game, it somewhat makes us out to be suckers, but perhaps an optimistic view would be this also demonstrates how loyal fans are to the team (and how much we believe in the “dream”). Of course a friend of mine also pointed out on Friday that all this activity could just be business people using the game as a place for negotiations.

Stajan versus Crosby

If I only had my better camera. Oh well, not a bad shot.

Some random check

Some random check.

Aside from the dramatics the game was a fierce and tense one. The Star reports that this was one of the most attended games, likely because of #87 Sidney Crosby (aka. Sid the Kid, apparently). While Sid the Kid was fierce and anyone could see he was very agile and extremely fast on the ice, #11 Jordan Staal was capturing the attention of the crowd especially since he scored the first and last goals of the game into overtime. The first period was rather bland with the Leafs taking a beating but the second period was amazing and pure magic as we saw Toronto catch up and even score a tie-breaker. I happened to be sitting near the right side behind the goal and watched the smooth passes taking place. Too bad the magic dissipated in the third period and after Newberry was injured and had to be carried away in a stretcher. After that it seemed like the Leafs became desperate and lost all sense of tactics and strategy into overtime.

I honestly think the idea of throwing yourself on the ground to block the puck has to be one of the worst moves to watch in the NHL. As my dad put it, if you throw yourself on the ground, suddenly your team is one man down because you have to get yourself up and find the opponent. Leave the goal tending to the goalie and focus on keeping the puck away from the opposing team.

Regardless, it was an amazing game to watch. No one left the game early because it was such a tight intense match. There were some moments that didn’t make sense like when #25 Hal Gill just literally knocked down one of the penguins, jumped on him and started hammering in. Purely instigated. Later the refs took down #80 Nik Antropov on a harsh penalty in overtime on something that hardly looked like hooking, but I guess when it’s 4 on 3 in overtime they wanted to make things extra fair. Good game overall. Too bad the Leafs lost as well as lost one of their guys. In the beginning of the game, one of the refs got hit by a puck too so there were a few odd moments. In addition, the subway shut down on the way back home causing a huge amount of chaos between Lawrence and Finch station.

A tie-breaker cheer!

 

technorati tags:, , , , , , , , ,

What is Health Care?

I don’t necessarily have a specific or particular stance on political ideologies. I believe there isn’t really a place for anyone in any camp. Why you ask? Because … every situation is different.  I really do understand what the government and civil servants have to deal with when creating and implementing policy that affect millions of people across the province or country. One thing is for sure … it isn’t easy, but no one ever said it would be, although we may sometimes think it. Everyone really only has demands and usually come up with solutions that provide answers that are amicable only to their demands (and maybe a few of their friends…). But one thing that should be done across the nation (oops, country), is to determine the definition of “essential health care”. Does it include dental checkups? Eye examinations? Or should it only include emergency measures?  We can’t use broad and vague statements that go like, “well, as long as no one gets hurt…”

We really need to ask ourselves what it is that is essential to all Canadians. Forget about the fact that you may happen to have benefits provided by an insurance plan with your employer, forget about the role that money plays, and definitely forget about who you are. Because it isn’t about you. It is about everyone.

Just read something in The Toronto Star (February 10 2007):

Dental care was not included in the Canada Health Act, the legislation that determines which medical treatments provincial insurance like OHIP must cover. The federal Act only requires that provinces pay for dental care that requires treatment in hospital.

In Ontario, social assistance programs like Ontario Works and the Ontario Disability Support Program provide limited dental care. Children whose families are on social assistance receive basic preventative dental care until they are 18 as long as they remain in school. Adults on Ontario Works, formerly called welfare, are only entitled to emergency care. In Toronto, that includes extractions and root canals of the front teeth. There is no preventative care.

Many would respond in an agreeable manner that we should do something about this, others would likely ask where the money would come from (although I did say forget about the money remember?) Regardless, health care takes an enormous amount of money from the taxes that the government collects. In fact, for the Ontario government alone, quite often the largest chunk of the annual budget is spent on health care alone (if you don’t believe me, look it up).  While I was studying public administration, quite often the issue of health care would pop up because the Ministry of Health and Long-term Care would take nearly half of the government’s budget leaving the other half for the rest of the government agencies to fight over.  What would you do then?  Do you have a brilliant idea to reduce the cost of health care?  Perhaps a way to redefine what we think of as “health care” ?  For the time being, the federal and provincial governments continue to play the blame game.  We’ll see how long this takes to play out . . .

Next up:  taxes and economic policy (oooh, i can hear the excitement already…)

losing perspective

Some recent news that I have read and must make a small response to:

From the Globe and Mail (February 8th 2007):

“In Canada, we may live in a multicultural society, but the evidence suggests that fewer and fewer of us are living in multicultural neighbourhoods,” says Allan Gregg, who has written about geographic concentrations of immigrants and is chairman of the Strategic Counsel, a polling and market-research firm. “We spend so much time congratulating ourselves on tolerance and diversity that we have allowed it to slide into self-segregated communities, isolated along ethnic lines.”

My response: Wow! Please do not tell me that the media, Think Tanks and policy makers alike have just discovered this. Honestly, I could have told them about this a loonnng time ago (most likely since I was in junior high (middle school)). The best solution for this is really for everyone just to lose their preconceptions and instead simply be a good and kind person to one another. I don’t really believe a complex policy implemented by the government can really do that much although all media should do a better job itself by helping break through stereotypes and image barriers. There is talk of Trudeau’s multiculturalism bill and its inherent effects on integration into Canadian society, but in my opinion, to use that as a scapegoat is a pure excuse.

I won’t get into policy because policy is a government creation as opposed to an initiative that we as individuals choose to take it upon ourselves and do something for a change no matter how minor we may view the result. For people to feel like a part of Canada and to feel like they are a fellow Canadian, it is up to each of us as an individual to make them welcome wherever and whenever possible, not some policy written on paper that has tax dollars thrown at it.

All it takes is one person to change another’s perspective.

technorati tags:, , , , , , , , , ,

Does the PC really suck? Are Macs really worth the hype?

I noticed that lately, both Mac and PC users are becoming a little heavy handed with their words and bashing one another with little reason…

From the Guardian, UK - February 5th 2007:

Aside from crowing about sartorial differences, the adverts also make a big deal about PCs being associated with “work stuff” (Boo! Offices! Boo!), as opposed to Macs, which are apparently better at “fun stuff”. How insecure is that? And how inaccurate? Better at “fun stuff”, my arse. The only way to have fun with a Mac is to poke its insufferable owner in the eye. For proof, stroll into any decent games shop and cast your eye over the exhaustive range of cutting-edge computer games available exclusively for the PC, then compare that with the sort of rubbish you get on the Mac. Myst, the most pompous and boring videogame of all time, a plodding, dismal “adventure” in which you wandered around solving tedious puzzles in a rubbish magic kingdom apparently modelled on pretentious album covers, originated on the Mac in 1993. That same year, the first shoot-’em-up game, Doom, was released on the PC. This tells you all you will ever need to know about the Mac’s relationship with “fun”.

Is all this really necessary?

The answer: yes

But only yes for marketing. So while everyone continues to acknowledge the supremacy of a product they bought for their OWN use, we all continue to perpetuate the marketing scheme of the century, a battle that neither side will win or lose.

Cut the crap and stop bickering. Stop helping both sides market their product piece of junk. If you really think that either product would be the ultimate solution to the world or to design, development, business, science, then I’d likely say that you are seriously deluded!

PC users: Honestly, no one has all the time in the world to tinker with their computers not to mention has the ability to overcome their fear of technology. Not everyone wants to deal with Bill Gates and his buggy products. Even with Linux, democratization of technology is a complex ideal. Unfortunately not everyone can grasp that ideal, let alone has the time. That’s the reason for the Mac’s existence.

Mac users: If you seriously think that the best computer in the world is developed by a company that monopolizes the industry through a single design concept derived from other companies, does not permit anyone else in the world to build something similar and for that reason, charges a premium price for it … then what can I say? You’re willing to spend the money … but do you really think that one organization can develop the ultimate product? I would disagree…

In photography, we tend to agree that while you have continual progress in technology … regardless of the camera you are using, it is a mere tool. If you don’t know how to use it, then what is the point? Same goes for any computer.

The Moral of this Story: Stop helping computer companies market their products. I think they can do that themselves!

I remember the movie Brewster’s Millions … and his excellent idea. Monty Brewster gets himself into a political election and he asks the crowd: What are you gonna vote?

The answer: none of the above

technorati tags:




Close
E-mail It