Monthly Archive for December, 2007

10 Excellent Examples of Marketing Ideas

Am I talking about marketing ideas, or marketing ideas?

Technically … both.

In my previous post, I mentioned that marketing in its basic and most noble form is the ability to freely changing ideas with an audience. Here are what I feel are exceptional examples of marketing ideas (and marketing ideas!).

Within each of these examples, there is a purpose, there is a story to tell in some form or fashion, and they ultimately leave the consumer (of information) the choice to embrace or reject the idea of change without annoying them.

Here they are in no particular order:

Seth Godin - Only Two Years Left

Seth Godin poses a great question to his readers:
“Here’s a question that you should clip out and tape to your bathroom mirror. It might save you some angst 15 years from now. The question is, What did you do back when interest rates were at their lowest in 50 years, crime was close to zero, great employees were looking for good jobs, computers made product development and marketing easier than ever, and there was almost no competition for good news about great ideas?”

Simon Collison - The Saga of the Interwebs

Simon creatively retells the coming of age story of the World Wide Web and its many issues revolving around technical standards:
“Everybody wanted a role in the unraveling saga. Barely a day went by without a new group of experts forming to place a flag in a methodology and claim it as their own for improvement. The Styling Sheet Discussion Group, The Working Group Task Force, The XHTML2 Book Club, The HTML5 Bandits, The Fantastic Four, Spiderpig and the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles all met in their own imaginations to procrastinate about whether or not ginger biscuits should replace custard creams during the refreshment break, or if skiffle musician Paul of Kintyre had really died in 1967.”

Chris Garrett - The 80/20 Rule of Effort

Chris reminds people of the Pareto Principle in his own words:
“This 80-20 rule, or Pareto Principle, suggests that a small percentage of your effort brings most of your results, while a much smaller part of your achievement comes from where most of your time goes. Homing in on the time-draining aspects versus those productive tasks could be a quick and easy fix. It is identifying the correct targets for promotion or deletion that is the tricky part.”

Joshua Porter - Five Principles to Design By

Joshua writes an excellent article on design and their impact on us as human beings and users:
“Design, on the other hand, is about use. The designer needs someone to use (not only appreciate) what they create. Design doesn’t serve its purpose without people to use it. Design helps solve human problems. The highest accolade we can bestow on a design is not that it is beautiful, as we do in Art, but that it is well-used.”

Rands - The Nerd Handbook

I’ve posted this already before because it affirms my role as a nerd in this world but Rands puts it so much more eloquently and really explains why and how people can understand the nerds that they are associated to:
“At some point, you, the nerd’s companion, were the project. You were showered with the fire hose of attention because you were the bright and shiny new development in your nerd’s life. There is also a chance that you’re lucky and you are currently your nerd’s project. Congrats. Don’t get too comfortable because he’ll move on, and, when that happens, you’ll be wondering what happened to all the attention. This handbook might help.”

apophenia - Who clicks on ads? And what might this mean?

I am confident that marketers and the whole consortium of people focused on advertising over the world wide web are very keenly interested in what apophenia’s article has to say on the demographics of who really clicks on those online ads:
“Of course, while the ad world is obsessed with clicks because they can measure those, ad receptivity is more than just clicks. While people dream of adding clicks to TV, TV ads have been tremendously successful without the clicking option. Brand recognition, for example, is an acceptable outcome from the POV of many marketers. But the web lets us measure clicks so advertisers tend to care about clicks.”

Not all of the examples are through words of course …

Go Around twice if you’re happy (via ebin)

Great visual example on how ideas can be embraced, missed or ignored.

Monique Trottier - Better Books Conversation

I work in the book industry so this discussion dives right into the issues revolving around the Canadian book market. Monique and Dan did a great job of going through the different topics affecting book publishing and selling. Dan poses a question:
“But what if we’re publishing too many books that people don’t actually want? Then the whole problem looks a little different, and digitisation and better marketing can only help so much.”

Dan Ackerman Greenberg (via TechCrunch) - The Secret Strategies Behind Many “Viral” Videos

While I may not be fond of the ideas that Dan Ackerman Greenberg posted via TechCrunch, the enormous response demonstrated by the community and even people outside of the community revealed how people regard particular marketing tactics — they either embrace the idea or reject it.

CNN - The Screening Room’s Top 10 Life-Affirming Movie Moments

My last example is the only one coming from a large media company’s website. I use this because it really hit home how marketing ideas (or marketing ideas) really works. In this case, it’s affirmation of our human values or individual principles. I don’t necessarily think that all of those movies deserve to be at the top, but that’s how marketing works. My own favourite movie-moment comes from a scene in Secondhand Lions:

Sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most. That people are basically good; that honor, courage, and virtue mean everything; that power and money, money and power mean nothing; that good always triumphs over evil; and I want you to remember this, that love… true love never dies. You remember that, boy. You remember that. Doesn’t matter if it’s true or not. You see, a man should believe in those things, because those are the things worth believing in. — Hub

Merry Christmas World

How many things did you purchase this year for others? How much did you spend on yourself?  With the total amount of money you spent on yourself or others, how much influence can you wield around the world?

Despite my yearning to purchase a few items on my wishlist, I’ve painfully managed to refrain from doing so as well as from purchasing items for friends and family primarily because I want to see if I can push myself towards a state of mind where I do not feel the need to be purchasing massive number of gifts for everyone. I did receive a couple of small presents this year although I am trying to reduce that number.

This isn’t for a particular cause or some action against consumerism but rather my attempt at determining my level of freedom. The freedom that is the consequence of wanting fewer things in the world. We all have things that we need (to live) and want (to enjoy live comfortably). By no means am I preaching an ideology but rather this is to test my own ability to control the consumer in me — to be able to say no to purchasing something that I do not need but think would be neat to have, or to be able to wait until something is drastically lower in price.

It is funny that I am in marketing. Many people including my friends think of scams and very profit-driven individuals when the term marketing is mentioned. I think the problem is that the ones who are key in creating that perception are businesses (and individuals) with little regard for the power of other individuals and for that matter, consumers or the customer — maybe even society as a whole. I used to be a sceptic of marketing — until I realized that marketing is more than the sale.

Marketing is the ability to freely exchange ideas with an audienceIdeas have a purpose but the individuals have the power to decide which idea they want to embrace.  There is one I embraced just recently.

I ran across an article detailing how the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) project is doing. A few months ago, my sister and I decided to donate to the Give One Get One campaign to provide a child out there with a pretty spiffy little computer that uses very little power, is able to provide the child with nearly all the functions that we have on our power-hungry computers, and to also try out one of these laptops for ourselves and see how good it really is. Unfortunately, we haven’t received it yet so I can’t really speak on that topic yet. But I am happy to hear that children in Peru are beginning to reap the benefits of the initiative.

Merry Christmas World –  I hope for the best to come in 2008!

*** An amusing look at the past and present.

Amused…

Seth Godin’s response to Google’s Knol = SquidKnol

My new shelf

Online of course! Shelfari’s got a new look and I am enjoying it! Check out my new shelf here.

It’s now using javascript / AJAX rather than Flash which is probably a good idea since Flash wasn’t really necessary and often takes longer to load.

Boredom: Is there a future for Facebook?

Of course there is, but is it as big as people anticipate? If so, I’m not feeling it. I use Facebook on occasion and when I do, it is mainly because it’s one aspect of my job. Majority of my friends no longer log on very often and while the applications were a fun feature, it’s gotten pretty old. That is — aside from the stupid application notifications that continue to arrive and tell me that a friend has bitten me in some sort of manner. My friends and I used to some pet application and feed one another’s pets with old ragged boots, but that has gotten tiring as well despite the huge amount of amusement we received initially from doing so.

Just as an example of my own demographic — I am 26 — turning 27 very soon. I have friends and relatives who are older and younger than I am on Facebook ranging from 16 to 57 and I have begun to notice their usage level gradually slowing down.

What does this equate to?

It means that Facebook’s influence is not ever-expanding. Web 2.0 fanatics and sites that continue to multiply by copying and upgrading or building upon one another’s features will not win over users simply by making an application on Facebook’s platform or even Google’s potentially OpenSocial platform. The reign of superficial qualities, functions and aesthetics of Web 2.0 is over.

Providing interesting functions and impressive interactions between people is good and it is a feature that is highly regarded but the underlying flaw behind many web 2.0 sites and applications is the assumption that the time factor is constant. The other assumption is the friend factor — that if friends are there, people will almost always follow their friends.

The Internet is meant for diversity and many different communities. Websites that aid in the creation of such diversity and appeal to specific interests will prevail in the end. Facebook will survive, there’s no doubt about it but it definitely will not be the giant that people think it will become. Facebook is a gated-community with many communities but it’s key features are its human interaction functions. Some communities within Facebook will thrive, others will fade out and find another website that’s more suitable to its needs.

I know there are still many people who still live and thrive on Facebook, but for me — *yawn* … it just isn’t worth my time anymore — not for my interests anyways.

——

Check out Seth Godin’s recent blog on Facebook’s generational challenge. It’s not the same opinion as mine, but his post illustrates how communities in Facebook can be formed — how a university introduced people together to form a community (or more like a bunch of friends).

Knol Knol Knol …

Could Google make a name ever more easily-repetitive? But it is one syllable after all. Marketing people can’t seem to stop talking about the Google’s Knol. There is nothing spectacular about the Knol. The Knol is merely another product that Google is offering. There are some key differences between the Knol and it’s main competitors but that’s how things work when there is competition in a realm that already exists.

I realize most internet marketers are concerned about the page ranking between Google’s Knol and Wikipedia entries, but I honestly think that these are some of the most minor issues. Forget the whole idea of SEO (Search engine optimization), in my opinion, a whole industry that was spun out of the need to improve one’s ranking on search engines ends up providing Google with an extra boost of credibility and power. Some may argue that it is necessary but I feel that if you have a quality website that is truly relevant and genuinely interesting to people, you will get the right people. Perhaps slowly, but surely.

There are of course search engine friendly (SEF) issues to deal with but I feel those are a lot more organic than SEO in general.

Nevertheless if you are keen on learning about the Knol, I’m not here to stop you. I will direct you to Darren Barefoot’s page on writing great knols, as he has set up a whole website that focuses on this topic.

How to Lose Support for Non-Profit Organizations

Charities, Not-for-profit agencies, non-profit organizations, or NGOs can all lose support easily.  They should not be focusing on trying to remind me to donate money to their cause consistently.   Most of these organizations are focused on fund raising and the only way they seem to know how is by consistently mailing or emailing me about renewing my membership or donating to a cause.

This is not going to work effectively because I am not going to donate to every charity out there.  I just can’t afford it and to be honest, I often feel there is an moral grey area in fund raising.  Even when I was fund raising for the United Way a few months ago I did not really like sending off emails asking for support, not that it even had a major effect anyways because majority of people did not respond.

With the introduction of the Internet, and in particular Facebook, fundraising can be a lot simpler and less intrusive for an individual.   It gives the control over to the people rather than the organization.  It sounds scary but if you want your cause to be supported, then allow people to have the choice of choosing to be reminded.

If I wanted to donate again, I will.  If I wanted to be reminded, I would ask.

An organization crosses the line when they send me reminders to renew a membership, even after I have already gone through the renewal process months ago.  This is an annoyance to me and just reminds me of why I won’t want to renew my membership next time around.  Believe or not, I keep getting notices over and over and over again.  I don’t need 5 notices in a month to remind me to buy a charitable lottery ticket or 3 envelopes in the mail telling me to renew my membership after I had already renewed it three months ago.

Lessons for today:

  • Let people choose to opt-in rather than the traditional opt-out
  • Make sure your system is working effectively and that customers or supporters do not receive additional “reminders”
  • Supporters are customers too.  They buy in to the cause that is being sold promoted to them.

Are You a Nerd?

Uh well, according to Rands In Repose’s Nerd Handbook, yes I am in fact a nerd.  Somehow this provides the inner-nerd in me peace of mind.  Oh well, back to working on some websites and consuming information!




Close
E-mail It