Archive for the 'applications' Category

Some Squirrel Marketing

Have you ever noticed how mainstream media, animated movies, have embraced and promoted the personification of squirrels? Of course they are nearly adored in all parts of the world … I am sure some may consider them larger rodents. Nevertheless … the cuteness of the squirrel never ceases, particularly with photographers. Tourists come to Canada to run around chasing after squirrels, trying to photograph them. Does that mean we should start promoting Canada as a squirrel-filled destination rather than only focusing food, culture, and the CN Tower? Well one little town in Ontario has done so — Exeter has been promoting that they have white squirrels.

Even the squirrels know that a little marketing on their behalf won’t hurt!

Three Reasons Why Twitter Wins Me Over

Social media is all about connectivity and what better way to embrace connectivity by making sure it is easy for users to embrace and use your social medium by utilizing from elsewhere.  I didn’t initially find Twitter useful, particularly since Facebook provided status updates but here’s why I’ve changed my mind.

1.  Twitter is plain and simple.  No extras necessary.  It’s all about conversation.

2.  Integrated.  The integration of Jabber/Google Talk is brilliant — this means I use it constantly because my gmail  is almost always open.  What’s in gmail?  Google Talk!  Twitter can also extend into the Facebook application.  Bonus!  I don’t need to log on to Facebook in order to update my status (which is really the only thing I do there).

3.  Twitter is lightweight and people can take the social medium and spin it to something else.  For example:  Foamee, where people can give IOUs to one another for beer.  ‘Nuff said.

Ultimately aside from the beer … twitter is a time saver … not a time consumer.  Granted Facebook and other social media websites are striving to keep people on their sites for as long as they can in order to gain advertising sales but ultimately I’m a busy guy and to me … everything is about time management.

Two aggregators I enjoy using most

With all the websites and social mediums I try out, it’s difficult to keep track of everything.  Lately there are a few options that can help aggregate everything you use.  I had run across suprglu.com a while back, and I enjoy tinkering around with it on occasion, but today I ran across yet another aggregator called soup.io.  Both are very easy to use and oddly enough, I enjoy playing with the customization features.  So in the end, I have to congratulate both of them for making their site fun
to use which I ultimately think must be the goal in mind when developing these new web 2.0 sites.  All too often, I find myself regarding these websites as work, or rather putting in more effort to customize what I want than if I were to simply code my own website.

On the note of aggregators, I have to extend an honourable mention to lijit, a search engine that allows anyone to search through all of your contributions in the social media realm.  It is essentially an aggregator but a very different one indeed.  You can see and try out the search widget on the left side of my blog.  I’m still waiting for a little more customization ability for this widget and their facebook application.

In case you were wondering…

My Soup  / My Suprglu

Google Book Search Unveils Share Feature

Over the past year, HarperCollins and Random House have introduced their own custom developed “sharing” feature for many of their books so that people have the ability to share an excerpt of a book on their blog or website.  Unfortunately for many Canadian publishers, there has been no sign of a solution that would provide them with the same competitive edge — at least not without additional funding that would allow for them to compete with the larger publishing houses (who are often also subsidiaries of multinational corporations).

People knock Google a lot for what they do against the publishing community, but from my perspective Google has done more for smaller presses in a smaller amount of time than any additional funding could have done for Canadian publishers.  Google and numerous other Internet revolutionaries have levelled the playing field for any company, small or big, to be successful.  Why is this ultimately the way things should be?  Because it helps the customer.  What use is a great product if a customer can’t find it?  What use is a great product if a crappy product is overshadowing it with its million dollar marketing campaign?  The bigger picture and vision is out there for Canadian book publishers to grasp, we just have to get around this whole hurdle that we keep trying to get our heads around, and that is absolute control.  No one, no organization and no company can have absolute control any longer, it is just not viable — not even for Google.

Google has introduced an excerpt sharing function that allows for people to share excerpts from books in the public domain.  I think this is a great beginning and I hope they will build upon this idea to allow publishers to do the same.  By doing so, the edge that larger companies have had will diminish and at least Canadian book publishers regardless of size will have a voice that is somewhat equal in volume.

Trees, nature and it’s own marketing campaign

I was hiking in Rouge Park (Toronto) over the past couple of weekends including this one and I was suddenly struck by the thought that nature is one of the most prominently marketed item no matter where we go. This is likely not the most original idea, and by no means am I at all a fanatical environmentalist, but I am definitely a nature enthusiast and as I gave this idea some more thought, I realized that in front of us was one of the largest marketing campaigns that we’ve seen and most likely the longest run as well.

Pedestrians only?

Some may suggest I am stretching my imagination a little here but I would disagree by pointing at the fact that marketing despite the rather rigid dictionary definitions, is the action(s) taken to inform, promote and serve the citizen/client/customer with regards to the product that is being provided.

When we walk down the street, when we go for a swim, when we go camping, or simply when we breathe … we are using a product of nature(tm!). Of course, just like all products everyone has their subjective point of view.

i.e. I walk down the street –> spot a tree –> brain responds with a memory/fact/other –> person’s own reaction/response

Maybe a little over-simplified, but it gets the point across (hopefully). Not only do trees planted throughout the city provide a constant message to the people living within the area, the message that the trees provide changes based on the season. Just think of autumn. Now just a warning that I use the equal sign very liberally and no that does not equate to any political leaning :P

  • Autumn + Trees = Beautiful and Vibrant Red, Orange and Yellow Leaves

Sometimes we can even add on to the equation with, say … winter.

  • Winter + Trees = Potentially snow-covered trees? = Christmas

This of equation of course can be reversed or you may even consider a negative product … like smog.

  • Smog = Pollution + lack of Trees = Tree Planting Policy

My general point with all of these funky and weird equations is that nature had implemented its own marketing campaign since the beginning of time. There is of course customer immunity … do people really automatically think about nature and the trees when they walk by? Doubt that many do … with the possible exception of outdoor excursions such as hiking and camping (without alcohol).

Nature of course depends on its evangelists, people who have taken it upon themselves to push forward particular goals that may or may not benefit nature as a whole. Of course this has created a storm of discussion and debate by having evangelists of all kinds — some of them being the citizen, the corporation, the politician, the environmentalist, the activist, and the individual. Oh! Almost forgot our friends at the zoo. Everyone one of these evangelists keep nature within the attention span of the general public.

Then you have word-of-mouth, or quite often when it comes to nature … scene-of-eye (aka. the photograph). Ever since the camera was invented, the photograph has helped spread the word (sorry, scene) about nature and its beauty. Tourists love taking photographs and what better way for nature to promote itself than to pose with tourists? Some corporations even use nature stock photographs in their advertisement!

So next time you look for shade under a tree, breathe the air (or smog), kick the leaves on the ground during autumn, look up in the sky and admire those big white clouds, have a lion as a company mascot, drink a glass of water, or pose for a photograph with a great scenic view behind you … remember that you are part of a greater plan — that is … a marketing plan.

Ask yourself how you think of nature and how it is connected with everything in some way or shape. I gave it some thought and put together a word cloud to just illustrate how messed up creative my thinking really is. Make one of your own!

Nature Word Cloud

 

My virtual bookshelf

I’ve decided to make myself a virtual bookshelf and thanks to Shelfari, I am now able to. I think it’s an interesting and more visual method of sharing what books I own and my opinion of them. The more typical aspect of Shelfari is the “others who own this book … also own … “. One thing I do like about Shelfari is that they are not depending on Amazon’s infrastructure so much and are trying to have their own database of the different books out there. It does to some degree “learn” about new books through an option of searching on Amazon when it can’t find a particular book on its own database. I am curious as to how much more effective Shelfari will be at providing new and creative ways for people to find new books that would be of interest to them.

For the meantime, you may check out My Bookshelf on the menu link or check out the public page via Shelfari.

—– Update —–
On a side note, I started reading about Shelfari and realized that Amazon.com is investing in the relatively new startup.  How unfortunate that we just can’t get away from Amazon and that the online retailer is almost everywhere with little competition.  Don’t get me wrong, I love Amazon and the ideas that they have brought to the table but I believe independent diversity and competition in a business environment is necessary in order to truly push forward the customer’s best interest.  That being said, the fact that Amazon invested heavily into IT infrastructure technology of its own makes it quite the heavy weight to compete against.

Your Call: Vision or Visualization

Just a quick post.  Read/WriteWeb has posted 5 Alternative Ways to Browse Amazon, most of which are excellent ways to find new products that one may be interested in.  Now … it seems that people come up with all sorts of marketing ideas and visualization techniques for the music and movie industry yet when it comes to books, we tend to have nothing to show.  With BISAC codes to work with and the ratings and reviews that Amazon’s infrastructure provides, someone has got to be able to code a visualization for books.  Some people may ask why?  I will ask why not?  It’s the only way to move the entire industry towards a state where people can truly find what they are looking for.  Do not tell me about word-of-mouth because that is a constant factor in any market.

Anyways, take a look at the different visualizations that have been developed to browse Amazon’s movie and music offerings.  I think it’s worth giving some thought with regards to finding new ways of marketing books… maybe one of the bigger publishers will have the income to push forward something like this.  Or maybe … just maybe … Canadian publishers can work together to develop something that provides a real alternative online, rather than a band-aid solution based on grants from the government.

The Sound of Silence (Don’t let it happen!)

Honestly, I deal with the silly web 2.0 stuff too much at work to talk about it here when I’m home but if there is one thing out of the whole web 2.0 bubble that I believe is truly amazing and worthwhile (aside from blogs), it would have to be the introduction of the new Internet radio. The Music Genome Project (now Pandora) and Last.FM are huge achievements for the music industry and serves as fantastic opportunities to market music directly to the individual’s tastes. The consumer also gets the chance to find music that they actually like and listen to it in full.

Of course this is too good to be true right? The music industry just has to kick and injure itself because they fail to see the opportunities. This time all Internet radio stations are being forced to pay royalties based on how often a song is played, something that does not happen in other kinds of “radio stations” and is not realistic whatsoever. I’m sure they (the music industry) did their typical SWOT analysis in their little strategic planning meet and greet, but they focused on the threats. Stan Schroeder of Frantic Industries makes some excellent points on what the RIAA and its pals are worried about and the downfalls of failing to see what consumers really want. It’s just like digital rights management all over again!

For me, unless satellite radio becomes free … I doubt I will be listening to it and radio stations are beginning to be rather bland as they have to pander to the many taste buds out there. What Internet radio provides is an excellent alternative for people like myself who want an easy way to find and discover new music or even older music that we may not have known about.

What should we do … what should we do? Well go on over to Savenetradio.org and tell those folks in the U.S. Congress what you think. I would help, but I’m Canadian so I’m just trying to help spread the word. Another reason to blog…

At least there is still Amie Street, an independent music seller.




Close
E-mail It
Clicky Web Analytics